exam 2 principles of law Flashcards


Set Details Share
created 3 weeks ago by sariA04
updated 3 weeks ago by sariA04
show moreless
Page to share:
Embed this setcancel
COPY
code changes based on your size selection
Size:
X
Show:

1

when you act differently because you are being watched

observer bias

2

through experience it can lead to interpretation; if something happened to someone personally, it is going to affect how they interpret data; acting differently because you know you are being watched

observer effect

3

drawing conclusions to confirm their beliefs (ex. thinking someone committed the crime because they didn't cry when questioned); makes you feel superior; can happen if you get too much context about a case as a forensic scientist; conclusions drawn to support own belief

confirmation bias

4

"the process of placing an object in a unit category that consists of a single unit. Individualization implies uniqueness." Individualization refers to "absolute specificity and absolute identification." on page 205 of paper 5

individualization

5

reliance on emotion and cross linkages to draw conclusions (mental shortcut)

peripheral processing

6

reliance on data to draw conclusions

central processing

7

error rate associated within lab itself; always disclose that for your lab, these are the results (lawyer may try to discredit your response by saying how does your statement apply to other labs); error rate or variability within an experiment (published development study)

internal validation

8

error rate in general among all labs; error rate within a real a world problem (applying study)

external validation

9

prior experience makes you make mental shortcuts, application of things

anchoring effect

10

gives insight to a case but does not individualize; most evidence is circumstantial; enough circumstantial evidence can lead to juries drawing conclusions; in conjunction with other evidence ties someone to the scene

circumstantial evidence

11

A jury composed of educated people trained to avoid implicit bias, educated to be a juror

Blue Ribbon Jury

12

can ask questions; Decides whether there is probable cause to charge someone with a crime (issue an indictment).

grand jury

13

science can be taken the wrong way if you say it too inflexible; do not box yourself in; allow for interpretation

science is truth

14

federal standard for evidence admissibility established in 1993

Daubert

15

judge is gatekeeper and has the discretion whether evidence fulfills Daubert (1996)

kumho Tire vs Carmichael

16

can give opinions

consulting, expert, testimonial witness

17

can give facts relevant to the case

fact or material witness

18

interpretation of the law depends on location and scale of community engaged NOT SOCIETY

legal resolution

19

following law exactly how its written

verbatim law

20

interpreting law for a more modern interpretation

interpretative law

21

evidence that can be traced back to a single source

individualizing evidence

22

high courts must defer to lower courts for decisions

GE vs Joiner

23

Thomas coon; huge shift in how things are done but it is based on previous data generated (ex. PMI vs TOC)

paradigm shift

24

witness can render an opinion

expert witness

25

low variance in response

precision

26

disconnect between historical and current data resulting in a novel idea with no linkage to the past

revolution

27

Federal standard for admissibility of evidence established in 1920s

frye

28

witness possessing information going to facts that impact case merit

fact witness

29

process for determining admissibility of evidence of expert for trial - typically done in the presence of a judge

voir dire

30

rules developed by federal government regulating witnesses and how they are admitted

FRE 701-706

31

general acceptance

Criteria for Frye

32

witness can render an opinion

consulting witness

33

data, expert, or method utilized and are consistent/dependable

reliable

34

law is verbatim with application

originalist

35

Developed philosophy applied to Daubert standard

Karl Popper

36

rules developed by society

Law

37

data, method, or expert provide insight to investigation/trial

relevant

38

witness can render an opinion

testimonial witness

39

drug presumably responsible for birth defects- resulted in Supreme Court ruling govern evidence admissibility

Bendectin

40

witness possessing information going to facts that impact case merit

Material witness

41

data have variance but often capture true result

accuracy

42

Producer of drug that led to Daubert decision

Dow pharmaceutical

43

law is interpreted and changes with society NOT LOCATION (interpretation changes over time as society evolves)

living document

44

Testable, published, error rate, specific community acceptance

Criteria for Daubert

45

Starts with a general principle and applies it to reach a specific conclusion; "top-down"; uses a general principle or premise as grounds to draw specific conclusions

deductive reasoning

46

moves from specific observations to a general conclusion; "bottom-up"; uses specific and limited observations to draw general conclusions that can be applied more widely

inductive reasoning