Print Options

Card layout: ?

← Back to notecard set|Easy Notecards home page

Instructions for Side by Side Printing
  1. Print the notecards
  2. Fold each page in half along the solid vertical line
  3. Cut out the notecards by cutting along each horizontal dotted line
  4. Optional: Glue, tape or staple the ends of each notecard together
  1. Verify Front of pages is selected for Viewing and print the front of the notecards
  2. Select Back of pages for Viewing and print the back of the notecards
    NOTE: Since the back of the pages are printed in reverse order (last page is printed first), keep the pages in the same order as they were after Step 1. Also, be sure to feed the pages in the same direction as you did in Step 1.
  3. Cut out the notecards by cutting along each horizontal and vertical dotted line
To print: Ctrl+PPrint as a list

50 notecards = 13 pages (4 cards per page)

Viewing:

Law exam 1

front 1

A system of rules usually enforced through a set of institutions (law enforcement); rules developed by society

back 1

law

front 2

-More likely than not (scientific evidence requires 50.1% agreement to be admissible)

-involves disputes between people or organizations, the goal is to compensate the victim

back 2

civil law

front 3

Beyond reasonable doubt, punish the offender

back 3

criminal law

front 4

allows for interpretation

back 4

Interpretive law

front 5

black and white

back 5

factual law

front 6

apply their expertise/opinions in a particular field that is relevant in the court of law

back 6

expert witness

front 7

testifies to what they saw; not there to offer their opinion

back 7

Factual/material witness

front 8

-Hold their colleagues accountable

- apply their expertise/opinions in the court of law

- presents the facts related to their area of expertise

back 8

Roles of an expert

front 9

-education: where you went to school, level of education

- experience: years of experience

- appearance: attire, how you present yourself to the jury

-fee (what you charge): charging more makes you seem more valuable

back 9

Factors that impact value of an expert/perception of jury

front 10

experts who tailor their opinions to fit the hiring attorney's case theory

back 10

hired gun

front 11

want to be close to 50/50; they try to decipher if you're biased

back 11

case distribution

front 12

Body language, background, hours spent on case, terminology, confidence, understand case report/make sure there are no mistakes

back 12

Preparation

front 13

counsel that brought you in

back 13

Direct examination

front 14

opposing counsel asks you questions

back 14

Indirect/cross examination

front 15

legal rule that determines if scientific evidence or expert testimony is admissible in court; 1923; general acceptance

back 15

Frye

front 16

A systemic framework for a trial judge to assess the relilability and relevance of expert witness testimony before it is presented to a jury; 1993

back 16

Daubert

front 17

What are the criteria of Daubert?

back 17

1. testibility (can it be tested)

2. publication/peer review

3. known error rate (accuracy and precision)

4. Known standards (standard methods on how to do things)

5. generally accepted in relevant scientific community

front 18

prescription medication used to treat nausea and vomiting during pregnancy

back 18

Bendictin

front 19

judge is the "gatekeeper" of evidence; trial about benedictin drug causing birth defects

back 19

Daubert vs. merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993)

front 20

if a lower court makes a decision, the higher court has to follow/honor it; appellate courts must defer to trial judges on evidentiary rulings unless there is an abuse of discretion

back 20

General Electric vs Joiner (1997)

front 21

A federal trial judge's "gatekeeping" obligation applies not only to "scientific" testimony but to all expert testimony

back 21

Kumho tire vs. Carmicheal (1999)

front 22

A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise

back 22

Federal rules of Evidence (FRE) 702

front 23

to speak the truth, refers to the process of questioning potential jurors by the judge and attorneys to determine if they are suitable to serve on a jury in a particular case, essentially aiming to identify any biases or conflicts that might prevent them from being impartial

back 23

voir dire

front 24

Daubert vs. Frye

back 24

front 25

you need to give any evidence you have over to the defense

back 25

Brady evidence

front 26

data, method, or expert that provides insight to a case

back 26

relevance

front 27

data varies but includes the correct answer

back 27

reliability

front 28

offers guidance/opinions; advises and assists attorney's or judges on specific matter (cheaper)

back 28

consulting expert

front 29

offers opinions on the stand

back 29

testimonial expert

front 30

testifies what they saw; do NOT offer opinon

back 30

fact witness

front 31

interpretation of the law depends on where you're from; location drives interpretation of the law

back 31

legal resolution

front 32

Starts with a general principle and applies it to reach a specific conclusion; "top-down"; uses a general principle or premise as grounds to draw specific conclusions

back 32

deductive reasoning

front 33

moves from specific observations to a general conclusion; "bottom-up"; uses specific and limited observations to draw general conclusions that can be applied more widely

back 33

inductive reasoning

front 34

Consistency of results, low variability

back 34

precision

front 35

How close a measurement is to the true or accepted value (known value)

back 35

accuracy

front 36

drawing conclusions from an individual sample

- are the results being drawn truly representative of the observtions being described?

back 36

pseudoreplication

front 37

law is verbatim within the application; constitution should be interpreted based on the original meaning of its text at the time it was written; law is black and white

back 37

Originalist

front 38

interpretation from something to relate to current society

back 38

living document

front 39

concept evolves into a new concept, dependent ,on what was initally known

back 39

paradigm

front 40

independent way of thinking (didn't evolve from another concept)

back 40

revolution

front 41

a relationship between the 2 variable being examined

back 41

correlation

front 42

one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event

back 42

causation

front 43

Theory of falsification; scientific theories cannot be proven true, only falsified; philosopher; helped to develop the Daubert standard

back 43

Karl Popper

front 44

creates an inference; suggests a conclusion but does not directly prove it

back 44

circumstantial

front 45

Identifying something as belonging to a specific person, usually through unique characteristics like fingerprints or DNA, which directly link someone to a crime scene

back 45

individualization

front 46

conducts original empirical research, then experiments to verify the validity of the theory; designs and creates instrumentation and applied techniques; is published in own field with peers; and advances his field of knowledge

back 46

scientist

front 47

devoted to one kind of work or study; an expert in a specific area

back 47

specialist

front 48

what is the likelihood of getting the answer correct; frequency of errors; likelihood of incorrect results in scientific testing

back 48

error rate

front 49

limited and concentrated training, applies known techniques

back 49

technician/examiner

front 50

interpretation of material and information of an experiment

back 50

Practitioner