Print Options

Card layout: ?

← Back to notecard set|Easy Notecards home page

Instructions for Side by Side Printing
  1. Print the notecards
  2. Fold each page in half along the solid vertical line
  3. Cut out the notecards by cutting along each horizontal dotted line
  4. Optional: Glue, tape or staple the ends of each notecard together
  1. Verify Front of pages is selected for Viewing and print the front of the notecards
  2. Select Back of pages for Viewing and print the back of the notecards
    NOTE: Since the back of the pages are printed in reverse order (last page is printed first), keep the pages in the same order as they were after Step 1. Also, be sure to feed the pages in the same direction as you did in Step 1.
  3. Cut out the notecards by cutting along each horizontal and vertical dotted line
To print: Ctrl+PPrint as a list

40 notecards = 10 pages (4 cards per page)

Viewing:

Ethics midterm 1

front 1

Which of the following would make a sound argument?

back 1

An argument with true premises that's valid

front 2

Here's a valid argument I mentioned in class:

1) If USF is in FL, then USF is in America

2) USF is in FL

3) so USF is in America

Which valid form is this?

back 2

Modus Ponens

front 3

Here's a valid argument I mentioned in class:

1) If I'm in Germany, then I'm in Europe

2) I'm not in Europe

3) So I'm not in Germany

Which valid form is this?

back 3

Modus Tollens

front 4

Here's a valid argument I mentioned in class:

1) If I'm in FL, then I'm in America

2) I'm not in FL

3) So I'm not in America

Is this valid or not?

back 4

Invalid

front 5

Here's a valid argument I mentioned in class:

1) She's either right-handed or left-handed

2) She's not right handed

3) So she's left handed

Which valid form is this?

back 5

Disjunctive Syllogism

front 6

Which branches of ethics will be covered in this course?

back 6

Normative Ethics and Value Theory

front 7

As mentioned in class, which branch of ethics will we spend the bulk of our time on this semester?

back 7

Normative ethics

front 8

Questions about Instrumental goods and intrinsic goods fall under which branch of ethiics?

back 8

Value Theory

front 9

As mentioned in class, instrumental goods are only valuable for the goods they bring about. True or false

back 9

True

front 10

As mentioned in class, intrinsic goods are valuable in their own right. True or false

back 10

True

front 11

Happiness is a classic example of which kind of good?

back 11

Intrinsic good

front 12

Money is a classic example of which kind of good?

back 12

Instrumental good

front 13

Hedonism falls under which branch of ethics?

back 13

Value Theory

front 14

Hedonism is the view that happiness is the highest intrinsic good among several intrinsic goods. True of false

back 14

False, it is the view that happiness is the ONLY intrinsic good

front 15

As mentioned in class, another more technical way to define Hedonism is that happiness is both necessary and sufficient for a good life. True or false

back 15

True

front 16

As mentioned in class, when we say that happiness is necessary for a good life, we mean that if one has happiness, one has a good life. True or false

back 16

True

front 17

Hedonism makes a distinction between two kinds of pleasures: physical pleasures and enjoyment (intellectual pleasures). Which kind of pleasure do Hedonists claim is happiness?

back 17

Enjoyment

front 18

One of the weaknesses of Hedonism is that it can't account for the commonsensical idea that there are numerous paths to the good life. True of false

back 18

true

front 19

One of the strengths of Hedonism is that it seems self-evident that happiness is intrinsically valuable. True or False

back 19

True

front 20

Shafer-Landau claims that the fact that we don't want our kids lobotomized - even if they'll be happier as a result - seems to show that happiness is not the end-all be-all of a good life. So does that suggest Shafer-Landau thinks Hedonismis true or false?

back 20

He thinks hedonism is False

front 21

As mentioned in class, Desire Satisfaction Theory is the view that satisfying your desires is both necessary and sufficient for something being good for you. True or False

back 21

True

front 22

As mentioned in class, when we say that satisfying your desires is necessaryfor something being good for you, we mean that something must satisfy your desires in order for it to be good for you. True or False

back 22

True

front 23

Desire Satisfaction Theory falls under which branch of ethics?

back 23

Value theory

front 24

As mentioned in class, Desire Satisfaction Theory claims there are no objective values

back 24

True

front 25

One of the strengths of Desire Satisfaction Theory is that it can explain the commonsensical idea that there are numerous ways to live a good life. True or false.

back 25

True

front 26

As mentioned in class, Desire Satisfaction Theory claims that satisfying your desires guarantees having something good for you. Which of the following is the kind of counterexample needed to undermine this claim?

1) Something that is good for you that doesn't satisfy your desires

2) Something that satisfies your desires that isn't good for you

back 26

both 1 and 2

front 27

One of the weaknesses of Desire Satisfaction Theory is that - while the view says that something must satisfy your desires in order for it to be good for you - there seems to be examples of things that are good for you that don't satisfy your desires (ex vaccination). True or false

back 27

True

front 28

Where does Shafer-Landau fall concerning Desire Satisfaction Theory? Does he think it is true or false?

back 28

false

front 29

Questions that concern the standards of ethics fall under which branch of ethics?

back 29

Normative Ethics

front 30

Divine Command Theory is the view that an act is immoral of moral just because it is prohibited or commanded (repsectively) by God

back 30

True

front 31

Divine Command Theory falls under which branch of ethics?

back 31

Normative Ethics

front 32

The Euthyphro Dilemma involves which of the following?

1) Does God command us to do actions because they are morally right

2) Are actions morally right because God commands them

3) Both (1) and (2)

4) None of the Above

back 32

3) Both 1. and 2.

front 33

Shafer-Landau claims that abandoning Divine Command Theory means giving up the view that God is the author of morality. As mentioned in class, does Matt agree or disagree?

back 33

Disagrees

front 34

Natural Law Theory is the view that an action is right because it's natural and wrong because it is unnatural; and that people are good or bad to the extent that they fulfill their nature. True or false?

back 34

True

front 35

Natural Law Theory falls under which branch of Ethics?

back 35

Normative Ethics

front 36

As mentioned in class, Natural Law Theory claims that the objective standard of morality is which of the following?

1) Laws of the universe

2) Human beliefs

3) Human nature

4) Laws of reason

back 36

Human nature

front 37

Psychological Egoism is the view that self interest is the strongest of several motivations for humans. True or false.

back 37

False. It is the ONLY motivation

front 38

Ethical Egoism is the view that actions are morally right just because they best promote one's self-interest. True or false.

back 38

True

front 39

According to Shafer-Landau, if Ethical Egoism is true, then altruism MUST be false. True or false

back 39

True

front 40

Ethical Egoism falls under which branch of ethics?

back 40

Normative ethics