Print Options

Card layout: ?

← Back to notecard set|Easy Notecards home page

Instructions for Side by Side Printing
  1. Print the notecards
  2. Fold each page in half along the solid vertical line
  3. Cut out the notecards by cutting along each horizontal dotted line
  4. Optional: Glue, tape or staple the ends of each notecard together
  1. Verify Front of pages is selected for Viewing and print the front of the notecards
  2. Select Back of pages for Viewing and print the back of the notecards
    NOTE: Since the back of the pages are printed in reverse order (last page is printed first), keep the pages in the same order as they were after Step 1. Also, be sure to feed the pages in the same direction as you did in Step 1.
  3. Cut out the notecards by cutting along each horizontal and vertical dotted line
To print: Ctrl+PPrint as a list

62 notecards = 16 pages (4 cards per page)

Viewing:

Psychology Chapter 11

front 1

Social Psychology-

back 1

The study of how people think about, influence, and relate to other people.

front 2

Person Perception-

back 2

Refers to the processes by which we use social stimuli to form impressions of others.

Ex: One important social cue is the face (physical attractiveness)

front 3

Stereotype-

back 3

A generalization about a group's characteristics that does not consider any variations from one individual to another.

Ex: Sorority girls are all snobby.

front 4

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy-

back 4

Expectations cause individuals to act in ways that serve to make the expectations come true.

front 5

Attribution Theory-

back 5

Views people as motivated to discover underlying causes of behavior as part of their effort to make sense of their behavior.

front 6

Internal/External Causes-

back 6

Causes inside and specific to the person, such as his or her traits and abilities. External attributions includes causes outside the person, such as social pressure, aspects of the social situation, and the weather.

Ex: Did Beth get an A on the test because she is smart, or because the test was easy?

front 7

Stable/Unstable Causes-

back 7

Is the cause relatively enduring and permanent or is it temporary?

Ex: Did Aaron blow up at his girlfriend because he is hostile or because he was in a bad mood that day?

front 8

Controllable/Uncontrollable Causes-

back 8

We perceive that we have power over some causes, but not others.

Ex: Preparing a delicious food for a picnic but having rain on the picnic day.

front 9

Fundamental Attribution Error-

back 9

Observers overestimate the importance of internal traits and underestimate the importance of external situations when they seek explanations of another person's behavior.

front 10

Actor-

back 10

In attribution theory, the person who produces the behavior to be explained. Usually explain their own behavior in terms of external causes.

front 11

Observer-

back 11

The person who offers a causal explanation of the actor's behavior. Frequently explain the actor's behavior in terms of internal causes.

front 12

False Consensus Effect-

back 12

The overestimation of the degree to which everybody else thinks or acts the way we do. Can be important in social interactions.

Ex: Someone in a group to which you belong makes a racially sensitive remark. According to this effect, the person is likely to interpret silence on the part of others in the group as agreement.

front 13

Positive Illusions-

back 13

Favorable views of the self that are not necessarily rooted in reality.

Ex: People who have high self-esteem

front 14

Self-Serving Bias-

back 14

Refers to the tendency to take credit for one's own successes and to deny responsibility for one's own failures.

Ex: If you do well on an exam you are likely to take credit for that success but if you do poorly you are more likely to blame situational factors (the test was too hard).

front 15

Stereotype Threat-

back 15

An individual's fast-acting self-fulfilling fear of being judged based on a negative stereotype about his or her group.

Ex: Whenever people think that people from Eastern Kentucky are stupid and don't wear shoes you may be worried you might live "down" to those expectations.

front 16

Social Comparison-

back 16

The process by which individuals evaluate their thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and abilities in relation to others.

Ex: You feel proud for getting a B on a test, only to feel deflated when you find out that your friend got an A.

front 17

Attitudes-

back 17

Our feelings or opinions about people, objects, and ideas.

front 18

Cognitive Dissonance-

back 18

A concept developed by Festinger, it is an individual's psychological discomfort (dissonance) caused by two inconsistent thoughts.

Ex: We feel uneasy when we notice an inconsistency between what we believe and what we do.

front 19

Effort Justification-

back 19

One type of dissonance reduction, means rationalizing the amount of effort we put into something. Explains strong feelings of loyalty toward a group based on the effort it takes to gain admission into that group.

front 20

Self-Perception Theory-

back 20

Daryl Bem's explanation of how behaviors influence attitudes, stating that individuals make inferences about their attitudes by perceiving their behavior.

front 21

The Communicator (Source)-

back 21

Trust worthiness and expertise are credibility characteristics that help a communicator change people's attitudes or convince them to act. Other source factors include power, attractiveness, and likability.

front 22

The Medium-

back 22

Another persuasion factor is the medium or the technology used to get the message across.

front 23

The Target (Audience)-

back 23

Age and attitude strength are two characteristics of the audience that determine whether a message will be effective.

Ex: Younger people are more likely to change their attitudes than older individuals. Weaker attitudes on the part of the audience make attitude change more likely than do deeply held attitudes.

front 24

The Message-

back 24

What kind of message is persuasive? Some messages involve strong logical arguments, and others focus on exciting emotions such as fear and anger in the audience. Which is more likely to work and when? The elaboration likelihood model addresses this question.

front 25

Elaboration Likelihood Model-

back 25

Identifies two ways to persuade: a central route and a peripheral route. The central route to persuasion works by engaging someone thoughtfully with a sound, logical argument. The peripheral route involves non-message factors such as the source's credibility and attractiveness or emotional appeals.

front 26

Foot-In-The-Door Technique-

back 26

Involves making a smaller request at the beginning and saving the biggest demand for last.

front 27

Door-In-The-Face Technique-

back 27

Involves making the biggest pitch at the beginning, which the customer will probably reject, and then making a smaller "concessionary" demand.

front 28

Altruism-

back 28

An unselfish interest in helping another person.

front 29

Egoism-

back 29

Involves giving to another person to ensure reciprocity; to gain self-esteem; to present one-self as powerful, competent, or caring; or to avoid social and self-censure for failing to live up to society's expectations.

front 30

Empathy-

back 30

A feeling of oneness with the emotional state of another person.

front 31

Market Economy-

back 31

A decentralized system featuring the free exchange of products and services between producers and consumers.

front 32

Bystander Effect-

back 32

The tendency for an individual who observes an emergency to help less when other people are present than when the observer is alone.

front 33

Aggression-

back 33

Social behavior whose objective is to harm someone, wither physically or verbally.

front 34

Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis-

back 34

States that the blocking of an individual's attempts to reach a goal always leads to aggression.

front 35

Culture of Honor-

back 35

A man's reputation is thought to be an essential aspect of his economic survival.

front 36

Overt Aggression-

back 36

Physical or verbal behavior that directly harms another person.

front 37

Relational Aggression-

back 37

Behavior that is meant to harm the social standing of another person through activities such as gossiping or spreading rumors.

front 38

Conformity-

back 38

A change in a person's behavior to coincide more closely with a group standard.

front 39

Informational Social Influence-

back 39

Refers to the influence other people have on us because we want to be right.

front 40

Normative Social Influence-

back 40

The influence others have on us because we want them to like us.

Ex: An inner city gang or members of a profession such as medicine or law.

front 41

Obedience-

back 41

Behavior that complies with the explicit demands of the individual in authority.

front 42

Deindividuation-

back 42

The reduction in personal identity and erosion of the sense of personal responsibility when one is part of a group.

front 43

Social Contagion-

back 43

Imitative behavior involving the spread of behavior, emotions, and ideas.

front 44

Social Facilitation-

back 44

Improvement in an individual's performance because of the presence of others.

front 45

Social Loafing-

back 45

Each person's tendency to exert less effort in a group because of reduced accountability for individual effort.

front 46

Risky Shift-

back 46

The tendency for a group decision to be riskier than the average decision made by the individual group members.

front 47

Group Polarization Effect-

back 47

The solidification and further strengthening of an individual's position as a consequence of a group discussion or interaction.

front 48

Groupthink-

back 48

The impaired group decision making that occurs when making the right decision is less important than maintaining group harmony.

front 49

Social Identity-

back 49

The way individuals define themselves in terms of their group membership.

front 50

Social Identity Theory-

back 50

The view that social identity is a crucial part of self-image and a valuable source of positive feelings about oneself.

front 51

Ethnocentrism-

back 51

The tendency to favor one's own ethnic group over other groups.

front 52

Prejudice-

back 52

An unjustified negative attitude toward an individual based on the individual's membership in a group.

front 53

Discrimination-

back 53

An unjustified negative or harmful action toward a member of a group simply because the person belongs to that group.

front 54

Sexual Harassment-

back 54

Unwelcome behavior or conduct of a sexual nature that offends, humiliates, or intimidates another person.

front 55

Mere Exposure Effect-

back 55

The phenomenon that the more individuals encounter something or someone, the more probable it is that they will start liking the person or thing even if they do not realize they have seen it before.

front 56

Secure Attachment Style-

back 56

An attachment style that describes adults who have positive views of relationships, find it easy to get close to others, and are not overly concerned or stressed about their romantic relationships.

front 57

Avoidant Attachment Style-

back 57

An attachment style that describes adults who are hesitant about getting involved in romantic relationships and once in a relationship tend to distance themselves from their partner.

front 58

Anxious Attachment Style-

back 58

An attachment style that describes adults who demand closeness, are less trusting, and are more emotional, jealous, and possessive.

front 59

Romantic Love-

back 59

Also called passionate love, it is love with strong components of sexuality and infatuation, often predominant in the early part of a love relationship.

front 60

Affectionate Love-

back 60

Also called companionate love; it is the type of love that occurs when an individual has a deep, caring affection for another person and desires to have that person near.

front 61

Social Exchange Theory-

back 61

The view of social relationships as involving an exchange of goods, the objective of which is to minimize costs and maximize benefits.

front 62

Investment Model-

back 62

A model of long-term relationships that examines the ways that commitment, investment, and the availability of attractive alternative partners predict satisfaction and stability in relationships.