front 1 Once a company has decided to employ a particular generic competitive strategy, then it must make such additional strategic choices as | back 1 A. Whether to enter into strategic alliances or collaborative partnerships |
front 2 Which one of the following is NOT a strategic choice that a company must make to complement and supplement its choice of one of the five generic competitive strategies? | back 2 C. Whether to employ a market share leadership strategy |
front 3 Strategic alliances | back 3 B. Are collaborative arrangements where two or more companies join forces to achieve mutually beneficial strategic outcomes |
front 4 A strategic alliance | back 4 C. Is a formal agreement between two or more companies in which there is strategically relevant collaboration of some sort, joint contribution of resources, shared risk, shared control and mutual dependence |
front 5 Entering into strategic alliances and collaborative partnerships can be competitively valuable because | back 5 B. Cooperative arrangements with other companies are very helpful in racing against rivals to build a strong global presence and/or racing to seize opportunities on the frontiers of advancing technology |
front 6 The best strategic alliances | back 6 A. Are highly selective, focusing on particular value chain activities and on obtaining a particular competitive benefit |
front 7 Companies racing against rivals for global market leadership need strategic alliances and collaborative partnerships with companies in foreign countries in order to | back 7 C. Get into critical country markets quickly and accelerate the process of building a potent global presence, gain inside knowledge about unfamiliar markets and cultures and access valuable skills and competencies that are concentrated in particular geographic locations |
front 8 A company racing to seize opportunities on the frontiers of advancing technology often utilizes strategic alliances and collaborative partnerships in order to | back 8 C. Help master new technologies and build new expertise and competencies faster than would be possible through internal efforts, establish a stronger beachhead for participating in the target industry and open up broader opportunities in the target industry by melding their capabilities with the resources and expertise of partners |
front 9 Which of the following is NOT a typical reason that many alliances prove unstable or break apart? | back 9 D. Disagreement over how to divide the profits gained from joint collaboration |
front 10 Experience indicates that strategic alliances | back 10 D. Have a high "divorce rate." |
front 11 Which of the following is NOT a factor that makes an alliance "strategic" as opposed to just a convenient business arrangement? | back 11 E. The alliance helps the company obtain additional financing on better credit terms |
front 12 The Achilles heel (or biggest disadvantage/danger/pitfall) of relying heavily on alliances and cooperative strategies is | back 12 B. Becoming dependent on other companies for essential expertise and capabilities |
front 13 Which of the following is NOT one of the factors that affects whether a strategic alliance will be successful and realize its intended benefits? | back 13 C. Minimizing the amount of resources that the partners commit to the alliance |
front 14 Which one of the following is NOT a strategically beneficial reason why a company may enter into strategic partnerships or cooperative arrangements with key suppliers, distributors or makers of complementary products? | back 14 C. To enable greater vertical integration |
front 15 The competitive attraction of entering into strategic alliances and collaborative partnerships is | back 15 A. In allowing companies to bundle competencies and resources that are more valuable in a joint effort than when kept separate |
front 16 The difference between a merger and an acquisition is that | back 16 B. A merger is a pooling of equals whereas an acquisition involves one company, the acquirer, purchasing and absorbing the operations of another company, the acquired |
front 17 Which of the following is NOT a typical strategic objective or benefit that drives mergers and acquisitions? | back 17 D. To facilitate a company's shift from a broad differentiation strategy to a focused differentiation strategy |
front 18 Mergers and acquisitions are often driven by such strategic objectives as to | back 18 A. Expand a company's geographic coverage or extend its business into new product categories |
front 19 Merger and acquisition strategies | back 19 B. May offer considerable cost-saving opportunities (perhaps helping to transform otherwise high-cost companies into a competitor with average or below-average costs) and can also be beneficial in helping a company try to invent a new industry and lead the convergence of industries whose boundaries are being blurred by changing technologies and new market opportunities |
front 20 Mergers and acquisitions | back 20 B. Frequently do not produce the hoped-for outcomes |
front 21 Vertical integration strategies | back 21 A. Extend a company's competitive scope within the same industry by expanding its operations across more parts of the industry value chain |
front 22 The two best reasons for investing company resources in vertical integration (either forward or backward) are to | back 22 D. Strengthen the company's competitive position and/or boost its profitability |
front 23 For backward vertical integration into the business of suppliers to be a viable and profitable strategy, a company | back 23 B. Must be able to achieve the same scale economies as outside suppliers and match or beat suppliers' production efficiency with no drop-off in quality |
front 24 The strategic impetus for forward vertical integration is to | back 24 A. Gain better access to end users and better market visibility |
front 25 Which of the following is typically the strategic impetus for forward vertical integration? | back 25 C. Gaining better access to end users and better market visibility |
front 26 A good example of vertical integration is | back 26 C. A crude oil refiner purchasing a firm engaged in drilling and exploring for oil |
front 27 Which of the following is NOT a potential advantage of backward vertical integration? | back 27 D. Reduced business risk because of controlling a bigger portion of the overall industry value chain |
front 28 Which of the following is NOT a strategic disadvantage of vertical integration? | back 28 C. Vertical integration reduces the opportunity for achieving greater product differentiation |
front 29 Outsourcing strategies | back 29 E. Involve farming out value chain activities presently performed in-house to outside specialists and strategic allies |
front 30 Outsourcing the performance of value chain activities presently performed in-house to outside vendors and suppliers makes strategic sense when | back 30 A. An activity can be performed better or more cheaply by outside specialists
|
front 31 The two big drivers of outsourcing are | back 31 B. A desire to take advantage of the fact that outsiders can perform certain activities better or cheaper and allowing a company to focus its entire energies on those activities that are at the center of its expertise (its core competencies) and that are most critical to its competitive and financial success |
front 32 Which of the following is NOT one of the benefits of outsourcing value chain activities presently performed in-house? | back 32 D. Preventing a company from hollowing out its technical know-how, competencies or capabilities |
front 33 Relying on outsiders to perform certain value chain activities offers such strategic advantages as | back 33 A. Obtaining higher quality and/or cheaper components or services
|
front 34 Outsourcing strategies can offer such advantages as | back 34 B. Obtaining higher quality and/or cheaper components or services, improving a company's ability to innovate and reducing its risk exposure |
front 35 The big risk of employing an outsourcing strategy is | back 35 B. Hollowing out a firm's own capabilities and losing touch with activities and expertise that contribute fundamentally to the firm's competitiveness and market success |
front 36 Which of the following is not one of the principal offensive strategy options? | back 36 C. Blocking the avenues open to challengers |
front 37 Which one of the following is an example of an offensive strategy? | back 37 C. Pursuing continuous product innovation to draw sales and market share away from less innovative rivals |
front 38 A blue ocean type of offensive strategy | back 38 D. Involves abandoning efforts to beat out competitors in existing markets and, instead, inventing a new industry or new market segment that renders existing competitors largely irrelevant and allows a company to create and capture altogether new demand |
front 39 A hit-and-run or guerilla warfare type of offensive strategy involves | back 39 E. Random raids by a small competitor to grab sales and market share from complacent or distracted rivals |
front 40 Launching a preemptive strike type of offensive strategy entails | back 40 B. Moving first to secure an advantageous position that rivals are prevented or discouraged from duplicating |
front 41 Which one of the following statements about offensive strategies is false? | back 41 D. One of the most potent types of offensive strategy is to introduce new features or models to fill vacant niches in a company's overall product offering and thereby better match the product offerings of key rivals |
front 42 Which one of the following is NOT a trait of a good strategic offensive? | back 42 A. Trying to build a more cost-efficient supply chain than rivals have |
front 43 Which one of the following is NOT a good type of rival for an offensive-minded company to target? | back 43 D. Other offensive-minded companies with a sizable war chest of cash and marketable securities |
front 44 Which one of the following statements regarding the basis for offensive attack on rivals is false? | back 44 E. Attacking a market leader is always unwise |
front 45 The purposes of defensive strategies are to | back 45 B. Lower the risk of being attacked by rivals, weaken the impact of any attack that occurs and influence challengers to aim their offensive efforts at other rivals |
front 46 Which one of the following is NOT a defensive option for protecting a company's market share and competitive position? | back 46 C. Running comparison ads that call attention to weaknesses in rivals' products |
front 47 Which of the following is a potential defensive move to ward off challenger firms? | back 47 A. Granting volume discounts or better financing terms to dealers/distributors and providing discount coupons to buyers to help discourage them from experimenting with other suppliers/brands
|
front 48 One of the biggest Internet-related strategic issues facing many businesses is | back 48 E. What role the company's Web site should play in the company's competitive strategy |
front 49 Which of the following is NOT one of the options that companies have for using the Internet as a distribution channel to access buyers? | back 49 A. Establishing a company Web site so as to have an Internet presence |
front 50 One very important advantage of a product-information-only Web site strategy is | back 50 D. Avoiding channel conflict |
front 51 The advantages of a brick-and-click strategy include | back 51 C. Low incremental investments to establish a Web site, the ability to access a wider customer base and the ability to use existing distribution centers and/or company store locations for picking orders from on-hand inventories and making deliveries |
front 52 Two big appeals of a brick-and-click strategy are | back 52 B. Economically expanding a company's geographic reach and giving existing and potential customers another choice of how to communicate with the company, shop for company products, make purchases or resolve customer service problems |
front 53 A company that elects to use the Internet as its exclusive channel for accessing buyers must address such strategic issues as | back 53 A. Whether it will have a broad or narrow product offering
|
front 54 Assuming a company elects to use the Internet as its exclusive channel for accessing buyers, then which of the following is not one of the strategic issues that it will need to address? | back 54 D. Whether to employ a forward integration strategy |
front 55 Being first to initiate a particular move can have a high payoff when | back 55 A. Pioneering helps build up a firm's image and reputation with buyers
|
front 56 In which of the following instances is being a first-mover NOT particularly advantageous? | back 56 B. When buyers are not loyal to pioneering firms in making repeat purchases |
front 57 Because when to make a strategic move can be just as important as what move to make, a company's best option with respect to timing is | back 57 E. To carefully weigh the first-mover advantages against the first-mover disadvantages and act accordingly |
front 58 When the race among rivals for industry leadership is a marathon rather than a sprint, | back 58 C. A slow mover may not be unduly penalized and first-mover advantages can be fleeting |
front 59 First-mover disadvantages arise when | back 59 A. The costs of pioneering are much higher than being a follower and only negligible buyer loyalty or cost savings accrue to the pioneer
|
front 60 In which of the following cases are first-mover disadvantages NOT likely to arise? | back 60 B. When new infrastructure is needed before market demand can surge |