Print Options

Card layout: ?

← Back to notecard set|Easy Notecards home page

Instructions for Side by Side Printing
  1. Print the notecards
  2. Fold each page in half along the solid vertical line
  3. Cut out the notecards by cutting along each horizontal dotted line
  4. Optional: Glue, tape or staple the ends of each notecard together
  1. Verify Front of pages is selected for Viewing and print the front of the notecards
  2. Select Back of pages for Viewing and print the back of the notecards
    NOTE: Since the back of the pages are printed in reverse order (last page is printed first), keep the pages in the same order as they were after Step 1. Also, be sure to feed the pages in the same direction as you did in Step 1.
  3. Cut out the notecards by cutting along each horizontal and vertical dotted line
To print: Ctrl+PPrint as a list

16 notecards = 4 pages (4 cards per page)

Viewing:

AP Gov Supreme Court Cases

front 1

McCulloch v. Maryland

back 1

McCulloch. Did Congress have authority under Constitution to commission a national bank. Congress had the power through the NEcessary and Proper clause to and the state of Maryland could not tax the Bank of US. Clarified how the US federal system worked.

front 2

US v. Lopez

back 2

Lopez. Whether the Gun Zones Free Act of 1990 exceeded Congress powers. Redefined the scope of congressional power and reinforced the principle of limited gov.

front 3

Engel v. Vitale

back 3

Engel. Did the recitation of a gov-composed prayer in public schools violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment? The prayer was unconstitutional and ended the practice of school-led prayers in public schools.

front 4

Marbury v. Madison

back 4

Marbury. Does Marbury have the right to his commission and can he use the federal government for it? Marbury was entitled to his commission, but the Court could not deliver it. Established judicial review as implied in Article 3.

front 5

Baker v. Carr

back 5

Carr. Did federal courts have the power to intervene and decide cases related to legislative apportionment. Protection of individual rights, opened the door for federal court to address and rectify instances of reapportionment and gerrymandering. Equal Protection Clause.

front 6

Wisconsin v. Yoder

back 6

Yoder. Under what conditions does the state's interest in promotign compulsory education override's parents First Amendment Right to free exercise of religion. Free Exercise Clause and 14th Amendment. Gov can't force past age of 14. Education doesn't override First Amend.

front 7

Tinker v. Des Moines

back 7

Tinker. Does prohibition towards wearing armbands in public school as a form of symbolic speech violate the student's freedom of speech as in the First Amendment. Students and teachers had the right to free speech in public schools as supported by First Amendment, unless there is a substantial interference.

front 8

Brown v. BOE

back 8

Brown. Does segregation in public schools by race violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment? Segregation violated the EPC of the 14th Amendment.

front 9

Shaw v. Reno

back 9

Prohibits states from racial gerrymandering under the 14th Amendment.

front 10

Citizen United v. FEC

back 10

Corps./orgs. had protected speech under First Amendment. Unlimited corporate spending, Super PACs, 'Dark Money.'

front 11

Gitlow v. New York

back 11

While the Court upheld Gitlow's conviction, the case established that the First Amendment's protections for free speech and press could be invoked against state actions, according to the Federal Judicial Center.

Selective incorporation.

front 12

Gideon v. Wainwright

back 12

Those who couldn't afford a lawyer be provided with one as stated in Article 6. Selective incorporation.

front 13

NYT v. US

back 13

NYT. Freedom of press and limiting prior restraint. First amendment.

front 14

Roe v. Wade

back 14

4th amendment right to privacy, and due process clause of 14th amendment.

front 15

MacD v. Chicago

back 15

states could not limit gun ownership for self-protection, 14th amendment due process clause, privileges and immunities clause, 2nd Amendment

front 16

Shenck v. US

back 16

Speech presented as a "clear and present danger" is not protected by the First Amendment. Free Speech.